Impact of double blind reviewing on SIGMOD publication
ACM SIGMOD RecordPublished 1 September 2006
Anthony K. H. Tung
Citations29
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.69
SNIP0.92
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Two studies here will show results contrary to the conclusion that double blind reviewing make no impact on SIGMOD publication.
Abstract
In [1], a set of statistic had been provided with the conclusion that double blind reviewing make no impact on SIGMOD publication. Our studies here will show results contrary to that finding.
Keywords
Computer Science
ACM SIGMOD RecordImpact of double-blind reviewing on SIGMOD publication rates
27 Citations2006Samuel Madden, David J. DeWitt
Starting with the 2001 SIGMOD conference, the SIG MOD Chair, in consultation with the SIGMOD Advisory Committee, imposed a double blind rule on all future SIGMOD conferences.