Priors, preferences and categorical percepts

The aim is to understand why the image structures in the upper panel support the assertion that they must arise only from very particular world structures, whereas the lower two structures seem more ambiguous.

Abstract

Visual perception is the process of inferring world structure from image structure. If the world structure we recover from our images "makes sense" as a plausible world event, then we have a "percept" and can often offer a concise linguistic description of what we see. For example, in the upper panel of Figure 3.1, if asked, "What do you see?", a typical response might be a pillbox with a handle either erect (left) or flat (right). This concise and confident response suggests that we have identified a model type that fits the image observation with no residual ambiguities at the level of the description. In contrast, when asked to describe the two lower drawings in Figure 3.1, there is some hesitancy and uncertainty. Is the handle erect or not? Does it have a skewed or rectangular shape? The depiction leaves us somewhat uncertain, as if several options were possible, but none where all aspects of the interpretation collectively support each other. What then, leads us to the certainty in the upper set and to the ambiguity in the lower pair?