Scale-Independent Bibliometric Indicators
Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and PerspectivesPublished 1 January 2005
J. Sylvan Katz
Citations45
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.46
SNIP0.52
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
This commentary focuses solely on the use of bibliometric indicators to compare international research performance and addresses the fundamental question of whether CPP or measures like CPP can be used to accurately compare the performance of groups of different sizes.
Abstract
(2005). Scale-Independent Bibliometric Indicators. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives: Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 24-28.
Keywords
Decision SciencesBusiness, Management and Accounting
Science and Public PolicyScale-independent indicators and research evaluation
130 Citations2000J. Sylvan Katz
UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)Bibliometric indicators for national systems of innovation
8 Citations1998J. Sylvan Katz, Diana Hicks