Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data
European Journal of Social PsychologyPublished 1 October 1985
David M. Messick, Keith P. Sentis
Citations167
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.45
SNIP1.44
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract This paper reports an experiment testing two hypotheses. The first is that the value or utility associated with a payment to one's self and a payment to a co‐worker can be represented as an additive function of a utility for own payment (nonsocial utility) and a utility for the difference between own and other's payment (social utility). The second hypothesis is that changes in the amount of work accomplished by one's self and/or the other should influence the social, but not the the nonsocial utilities. Support for both hypotheses is reported.
Keywords
Social SciencesDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ScienceThe Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
17,311 Citations1981Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
The psychological principles that govern the perception of decision problems and the evaluation of probabilities and outcomes produce predictable shifts of preference when the same problem is framed in different ways.
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyMotivational bases of choice in experimental games
1,110 Citations1968David M. Messick, Charles G. McClintock
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyEmpathy and altruism.
511 Citations1975Dennis L. Krebs
It was concluded that the similar subjects empathized most with the performer who appeared to experience pleasure and pain, and the subjects who reacted most empathically behaved most altruistically when required to make a choice between helping themselves at a cost to the performer or helping the performer at acost to others.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)Analysis of Factorial Experiments by Estimating Monotone Transformations of the Data
510 Citations1965Joseph B. Kruskal
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyFairness and preference
401 Citations1979David M. Messick, Keith P. Sentis
Systems Research and Behavioral ScienceSocial motivation—a set of propositions
370 Citations1972Charles G. McClintock
Systems Research and Behavioral ScienceToward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games
200 Citations1973Donald W. Griesinger, James W. Livingston
Systems Research and Behavioral ScienceA framework for social motives
174 Citations1976Kenneth R. MacCrimmon, David M. Messick
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyInternal standards revisited: Effects of social comparisons and expectancies on judgments of fairness and satisfaction
151 Citations1980William Austin, Neil C. McGinn +1 more
Journal of Marketing ResearchRobustness of Conjoint Analysis: Some Monté Carlo Results
139 Citations1978Frank J. Carmone, Paul E. Green +1 more
The authors compare the results using nonmetric analysis, full factorial designs, and rank data with quicker and less expensive methods of metric analysis, orthogonal arrays and stimulus ratings to indicate that metric analysis using ratings data and orthogonic arrays is very robust.
American Journal of SociologyThe Altruism Scale: A Measure of Co-operative, Individualistic, and Competitive Interpersonal Orientation
139 Citations1966Jack Sawyer
Both measures show that three college groups all differentiate among friend, stranger, and antagonist, and YMCA college students are generally more positively oriented toward the other's welfare-friend, Stranger, or antagonist.
Journal of Marketing ResearchAlternative Estimation Methods for Conjoint Analysis: A Monté Carlo Study
116 Citations1981Dick R. Wittink, Philippe C. Cattin
Simulation results obtained for four alternative estimation procedures suggest, within the limitations of the simulation study, that ANOVA may be the preferred procedure for compensatory models, whereas LINMAP is most likely to provide the best predictive validity for models with a dominant attribute.
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyRelative gain maximization in experimental games
113 Citations1967David M. Messick, Warren Thorngate
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyHandling negative inputs: On the plausible equity formulae
77 Citations1976Richard Harris
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsAvarice, Altruism, and Second Party Preferences
60 Citations1972Robert Haney Scott
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsAn Econometric Model of the Medicare System
36 Citations1971Martin Feldstein
The reduced form of the Medicare system is a model that combines extended care unit admissions, hospital insurance benefits per hospital episode, and Supplementary medical insurance into one system.
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyEquity judgments in hypothetical, four-person partnerships
30 Citations1980Richard J. Harris
Psychological BulletinUse of rank order data in functional measurement.
23 Citations1972David J. Weiss, Norman H. Anderson
Systems Research and Behavioral ScienceThe determination and scaling of a bivariate utility function
15 Citations1969David W. Conrath, Edward L. Deci
