Correlates of store brand proneness: some empirical observations
Journal of Product & Brand ManagementPublished 1 October 1995
Alan Dick, Arun K. Jain, Paul Richardson
Citations258
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.89
SNIP1.67
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Profiles heavy buyers of store brand products and compares them with light buyers in terms of demographics, socio‐economic, and attitudinal variables. The results suggest that younger, unmarried, and smaller sized households tend to avoid store brands. As compared with heavy buyers, light buyers of store brands are less familiar with them and perceive them to be of lower quality, less value for money and as riskier choices.
Keywords
Decision SciencesBusiness, Management and Accounting
Journal of MarketingExtrinsic and Intrinsic Cue Effects on Perceptions of Store Brand Quality
922 Citations1994Paul Richardson, Alan Dick +1 more
Journal of Marketing ResearchPerceived Risk and Its Components: A Model and Empirical Test
667 Citations1973James R. Bettman
Journal of MarketingExtrinsic and Intrinsic Cue Effects on Perceptions of Store Brand Quality
600 Citations1994Paul Richardson, Alan Dick +1 more
European Journal of MarketingFactors Affecting Consumers' Choice between Manufacturer Brands and Retailer Own Labels
95 Citations1978F. Livesey, Paul Lennon
Journal of MarketingThe Semantics of Branding
68 Citations1969Thomas F. Schutte
A basis for a new branding language in marketing is proposed for manufacturer-owned and distributor-owned brands and a distortion in the measurement and assessment of trends in manufacturers' brands is proposed.
