Tax Enforcement Problems
Scandinavian Journal of EconomicsPublished 1 March 1997Open access
Francisco Marhuenda, Ignacio Ortuño-Ortı́n
Citations24
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.09
SNIP0.98
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
We study an income tax enforcement problem using a principal‐agent model where the government sets the tax and inspection functions. These are announced to the agents and there is no commitment problem. The penalty function for dishonest taxpayers is given exogenously and satisfies certain social norms. We prove that, for a large family of penalty functions, this policy is such that honesty implies regressiveness. This result does not depend on the fact that agents know the true probability of inspection.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsOptimal Auditing, Insurance, and Redistribution
596 Citations1989Dilip Mookherjee, Ivan Png
Journal of Public EconomicsIncome tax compliance in a principal-agent framework
452 Citations1985Jennifer F. Reinganum, Louis L. Wilde
The Review of Economic StudiesSamurai Accountant: A Theory of Auditing and Plunder
344 Citations1987Kim C. Border, Joel Sobel
Journal of Public EconomicsHierarchical design and enforcement of income tax policies
159 Citations1993Isabel Fernández Sánchez, Joel Sobel
Journal of Public EconomicsEvading, auditing and taxing
89 Citations1990H. Cremer, Maurice Marchand +1 more
The Caltech Institute Archives (California Institute of Technology)A General Characterization of Optimal Income Taxation and Enforcement
12 Citations1994Parkash Chander, Louis L. Wilde
