<i>Kategoria</i> and <i>apologia:</i> On their rhetorical criticism as a speech set
Quarterly Journal of SpeechPublished 1 August 1982
Halford Ross Ryan
Citations163
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.39
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This essay demonstrates that a speech of accusation motivates a response in a speech of defense and that both should be treated as a rhetorical speech set. The author uses Fisher's motives of affirmation and purification, Bitzer's conception of the rhetorical situation, and the Classical schema of stasis to explicate the speech set. He offers Pope Leo X vs. Martin Luther as an illustrative example.
Keywords
Social SciencesArts and Humanities
A Greek-English lexicon
1,455 Citations1883Henry George Liddell
Quarterly Journal of SpeechThey spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia
520 Citations1973Ben Ware, Wil A. Linkugel
Speech MonographsA case study in speech criticism: The Nixon‐Truman analog
78 Citations1968Lawrence W. Rosenfield
Philosophy and RhetoricOn Rhetorical Genre: An Organizing Perspective.
57 Citations1978Jackson Harrell, Wil A. Linkugel
Southern Speech Communication JournalThe scope of apologetic discourse: Establishing generic parameters
54 Citations1981Noreen Wales Kruse
Central States Speech JournalMotivational factors in non‐denial apologia
49 Citations1977Noreen Wales Kruse
Southern Speech Communication JournalThe apologia, 1971 genre
31 Citations1972Sherry Devereaux Butler
Quarterly Journal of Speech<i>Stasis</i>in Aristotle's<i>rhetoric</i>
30 Citations1972Wayne Ν. Thompson
