Telling the truth about intentions
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Moynihan's hypothesis of the “sceptical recipient” is discussed, showing that it is compatible with predictions from games theory, and how it might be tested in contests in which the opponents differ in resource holding potential is discussed.
Abstract
In this paper I discuss Moynihan's hypothesis of the “sceptical recipient”, showing that it is compatible with predictions from games theory, and discuss how it might be tested in contests in which the opponents differ in resource holding potential. I also comment on evidence which suggests that in agonistic encounters information is transferred by unritualized actions, showing that these actions do not allow better prediction of behaviour than is allowed by ritualized agonistic displays, and that analysis of the interactions requires an approach based on games theory.
