Evaluative judgments of aspects of life as a function of vicarious exposure to hedonic extremes.

Abstract

In two experiments, the hypothesis was corroborated that vicarious exposure to hedonic extremes—especially the hedonically negative—results in contrast regarding evaluative judgments of aspects of life that have evolved or been acquired in the course of life beyond the laboratory. In Experiment 1, participants who wrote about hedonically. negative events occurring at the turn of the century expressed greater satisfaction on a composite index of present life quality than participants who wrote about hedonically positive events. In Experiment 2, participants who wrote about hedonically negative events, personal tragedies, scored higher on a composite index of satisfaction with life, health, and physical appearance than participants who wrote about hedonically positive events. The findings for the composites corroborate a comparison level model of evaluative judgment. The findings for individual items, however, suggest that aspects of life are not evaluated in terms of a single utility scale and standard—the comparison level. Other findings are discussed that appear to contradict a simple affective model of evaluation in which the positivity of evaluations is postulated to increase with the positivity of affective states.