The relationship between power and level for generic unit root tests in finite samples
Journal of Applied EconometricsPublished 1 July 1992
Stephen Blough
Citations175
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.31
SNIP1.71
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract We show that the maximum power of a generic unit root test against any stationary alternative is equal to the true level of the test. We then use Monte Carlo methods to investigate the implications for several such tests. We show patterns of rejection probabilities over a variety of unit root and stationary processes. We discuss the implications of these results for some of the uses of unit root tests in applied work.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
EconometricaCo-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing
31,933 Citations1987Robert F. Engle, C. W. J. Granger
BiometrikaTesting for a unit root in time series regression
17,948 Citations1988Peter C.B. Phillips, Pierre Perrón
Journal of EconometricsSpurious regressions in econometrics
6,192 Citations1974Clive W. J. Granger, Paul Newbold
Journal of Monetary EconomicsTrends and random walks in macroeconmic time series
4,635 Citations1982Charles R. Nelson, Charles R. Plosser
TechnometricsIntroduction to Statistical Time Series
4,318 Citations1978James T. McClave, Wayne A. Fuller
BiometrikaTesting for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order
3,218 Citations1984Saïd E. Saïd, David A. Dickey
Journal of Economic Dynamics and ControlTrends and random walks in macroeconomic time series
2,469 Citations1988Pierre Perrón
Journal of Monetary EconomicsA new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the ‘business cycle’
2,362 Citations1981Stephen Beveridge, Charles R. Nelson
Journal of EconometricsUnderstanding spurious regressions in econometrics
1,770 Citations1986Peter C.B. Phillips
NBER Macroeconomics AnnualPitfalls and Opportunities: What Macroeconomists Should Know about Unit Roots
1,270 Citations1991John Y. Campbell, Pierre Perrón
National Bureau of Economic ResearchTests For Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation
1,240 Citations1988G. William Schwert
Journal of Business and Economic StatisticsTests for Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation
654 Citations1989G. William Schwert
Journal of Economic Dynamics and ControlA critique of the application of unit root tests
319 Citations1991John H. Cochrane
Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public PolicyUnit roots in real GNP: Do we know, and do we care?
253 Citations1990Lawrence J. Christiano, Martin Eichenbaum
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationHypothesis Testing in ARIMA(p, 1, q) Models
130 Citations1985Saïd E. Saïd, David A. Dickey
Journal of EconometricsTesting for unit roots in autoregressive moving average models
123 Citations1991Sastry G. Pantula, Alastair R. Hall
BiometrikaTesting for a unit root in the presence of moving average errors
83 Citations1989Alastair R. Hall
Journal of Business and Economic StatisticsAsymptotic Distributions of Unit-Root Tests When the Process Is Nearly Stationary
76 Citations1991Sastry G. Pantula
