The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2002
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
No AccessPolicy Research Working Papers21 Jun 2013The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2002Authors/Editors: David Dollar, Victoria LevinDavid Dollar, Victoria Levinhttps://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3299SectionsAboutPDF (0.3 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract:Dollar and Levin examine the allocation of foreign aid by 41 donor agencies, bilateral and multilateral. Their policy selectivity index measures the extent to which a donor's assistance is targeted to countries with sound institutions and policies, controlling for per capita income and population. The poverty selectivity index analogously looks at how well a donor's assistance is targeted to poor countries, controlling for institutional and policy environment as measured by a World Bank index. The authors' main finding is that the same group of multilateral and bilateral aid agencies that are very policy focused are also very poverty focused. The donors that appear high up in both rankings are the World Bank's International Development Association, the International Monetary Fund's Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Norway, Ireland, and the Netherlands. As a robustness check the authors alternatively use institutional quality measures independent of the World Bank and find the same pattern of selectivity. They also find that policy selectivity is a new phenomenon: in the 1984–89 period, aid overall was allocated indiscriminately without any consideration to the quality of governance, whereas in the 1990s there was a clear relationship between aid and governance (institutions and policies). This increasing selectivity of aid is good news for aid effectiveness. The bad news is that the aid agencies that the authors survey vary greatly in size. Some donors that are largest in absolute size, such as France and the United States, are not particularly selective. Japan comes in high on the policy selectivity index but far down on the poverty selectivity index, reflecting its pattern of giving large amounts of aid in Asia to countries that are well governed but in many cases not poor. This paper—a product of Development Policy, Development Economics Senior Vice Presidency—is part of a larger effort in the Bank to examine aid effectiveness. Previous bookNext book FiguresreferencesRecommendeddetailsCited byUnder a money tree? Comparing the determinants of Western and Chinese development finance flows to AfricaOxford Development Studies, Vol.49, No.27 January 2021Profits before patients? Analyzing donors' economic motives for foreign aid in the health sectorWorld Development, Vol.132Puzzle and Paradox, Vol.112 February 2020Fiscal Capacity and Aid Allocation: Domestic Resource Mobilization and Foreign Aid in Developing Countries8 July 2020Waqf Resource Mobilization for Poverty Alleviation Based on Maqasid FrameworkSSRN Electronic JournalCan the New Deal solve the old problem of aid orphans and darlings? Aid effectiveness in fragile statesDevelopment Policy Review, Vol.34, No.49 June 2016Aid for Trade and trade tax revenues in developing countriesEconomic Analysis and Policy, Vol.50International Organizations: Loose and Tight Coupling in the Development RegimeStudies in Comparative International Development, Vol.51, No.115 April 2016Bibliography29 August 2015From Poverty Reduction to Mutual Interests? The Debate on Differentiation in EU Development PolicyDevelopment Policy Review, Vol.33, No.420 April 2015Performance-Based Aid: Why It Will Probably Not Meet Its PromisesDevelopment Policy Review, Vol.33, No.31 April 2015The TACIS Program in Russia, Ukraine, and Central Asia, 1992–20073 September 2014How Does Foreign Aid Affect the Relationship between IFRS Adoption and Foreign Direct Investment?SSRN Electronic JournalInteractions among Donors' Aid Allocations: Evidence from an Exogenous World Bank Income Threshold14 October 2014The Gradient of Governance: Distance and Disengagement in Indian VillagesThe Journal of Development Studies, Vol.50, No.64 March 2014Aid effectiveness and imperfect monitoring: EU development aid as Prisoner's DilemmaRationality and Society, Vol.25, No.4Shopping for Development: Multilateral Lending, Shareholder Composition and Borrower PreferencesWorld Development, Vol.44World Bank Rules for Aid Allocation: New Institutional Economics or Moral Hazard?30 August 2012Financing Growth: Foreign Aid vs. Foreign LoansSSRN Electronic JournalDO EMERGING DONORS ALLOCATE AID AS DAC MEMBERS DO? THE CASE OF KOREA IN THE MILLENNIUM ERAJournal of International Development, Vol.24, No.816 July 2012International Development Co-operation DiplomacyMGIMO Review of International Relations, No.6(21)28 December 2011China's Economic Cooperation with AfricaJournal of African Development, Vol.13, No.1-2Why the European Commission Fails to Adhere to the Principles of Good Donorship: The Case of the Governance Incentive TrancheEuropean Journal of Development Research, Vol.23, No.314 April 2011Should Easier Access to International Credit Replace Foreign Aid?SSRN Electronic JournalEasy to Declare, Difficult to Implement: The Disconnect Between the Aspirations of the Paris Declaration and Donor Practice in NigeriaDevelopment Policy Review, Vol.28, No.65 October 2010Development aid and economic growth: A positive long-run relationThe Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol.50, No.1Institutions, trade, and social cohesion in fragile states: Implications for policy conditionality and aid allocationJournal of Policy Modeling, Vol.31, No.6Financing universal primary education: An analysis of official development assistance in fragile statesInternational Journal of Educational Development, Vol.29, No.4Aid with multiple personalitiesJournal of Comparative Economics, Vol.37, No.2Aid Allocation and Aid Effectiveness: An Empirical AnalysisGiving and Receiving Foreign Aid: Does Conflict Count?World Development, Vol.36, No.12The Global War on Terror and U.S. Development Assistance: USAID Allocation by Country, 1998-2005SSRN Electronic JournalAid and Corruption: Do Donors Use Development Assistance to Provide the 'Right' Incentives?SSRN Electronic JournalWhere Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign AidSSRN Electronic JournalThe Doubling of Aid to Sub-Saharan Africa: Promises and ProblemsJournal of Contemporary African Studies, Vol.25, No.3Post-9/11 U.S. Foreign Aid, the Millennium Challenge Account, and Africa: How Many Birds Can One Stone Kill?Africa Today, Vol.54, No.1Aid Selectivity According to Augmented CriteriaThe World Economy, Vol.30, No.5La vulnérabilité économique, défi persistant à la croissance africaineAfrican Development Review, Vol.19, No.1La vulnérabilité macroéconomique des pays à faible revenu et les réponses de l'aideRevue d'économie du développement, Vol.Vol. 14, No.4Chapter 19 The Determinants of Aid in the Post-Cold War EraWho Deserves Aid? Equality of Opportunity, International Aid, and Poverty ReductionWorld Development, Vol.35, No.1Do Donors Care about Declining Trade Revenues from Liberalization? An Analysis of Aid AllocationSSRN Electronic JournalAre Aid Agencies Improving?SSRN Electronic JournalEmpirical Evidence on the New International Aid ArchitectureSSRN Electronic JournalTargeting Aid to the Needy and Deserving: Nothing But Promises?The World Economy, Vol.29, No.9Are Donor Countries Giving More or Less Aid?Review of Development Economics, Vol.10, No.3A Survey of the Theoretical Economic Literature on Foreign AidAsian-Pacific Economic Literature, Vol.20, No.1Bilateral Donors' Interest vs. Recipients' Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?Review of Development Economics, Vol.10, No.2Aid or Trade, or Aid and Trade?The Australian Economic Review, Vol.39, No.1An Index of Donor PerformanceSSRN Electronic JournalPourquoi donner de l'aide ? Commentaires autour de la notion de sélectivitéRevue d'économie du développement, Vol.Vol. 13, No.2Food Security in Complex Emergencies: Enhancing Food System ResilienceDisasters, Vol.2923 May 2005Setting the Trade Policy Agenda: What Roles for Economists?SSRN Electronic JournalThe Global War on Terror and U.S. Development Assistance: USAID Allocation by Country, 1998-2005SSRN Electronic JournalAn Index of Donor Performance-Revised August 2005SSRN Electronic JournalThe Global War on Terror and U'S' Development Assistance: Usaid Allocation By Country, 1998-2005SSRN Electronic JournalGlobal War on Terror and U.S. Development Assistance: Usaid Allocation By Country, 1998-2005SSRN Electronic JournalAid allocation and the costs of neglectConflict, Security & Development, Vol.4, No.319 January 2007 View Published: May 2004 Copyright & Permissions Related RegionsEurope and Central AsiaRelated CountriesDenmarkJapanNetherlandsPortugalTimor-LesteRelated TopicsEducationFinance and Financial Sector DevelopmentGenderHealth Nutrition and PopulationMacroeconomics and Economic GrowthPoverty ReductionSocial Protections and Labor KeywordsDEMOCRACYDEVELOPING COUNTRIESDEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCEGLOBAL DEVELOPMENTGOOD GOVERNANCEISSUES OF POVERTYLOW-INCOME COUNTRIESPOLICIESPOLICYPOLICY FRAMEWORKPOLICY RESEARCHPOLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPERPOPULATIONPOVERTYPOVERTY REDUCTIONPROGRESSRECIPIENT COUNTRYRULE OF LAWSOCIAL DEVELOPMENTSOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE PDF downloadLoading ...
