The abnormality of normal comparison groups: the identification of psychosis proneness and substance abuse in putatively normal research subjects
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The results indicate that an adequate substance abuse evaluation is extremely important and that brief self-report information may be misleading, and empirical derived assessment tools, such as the MMPI, may prove useful in allowing researchers to more accurately define control parameters and group membership.
Abstract
It is becoming increasingly apparent that the cursory self-report screening of normal subjects may result in unacceptable levels of psychopathology in comparison groups. The current results also indicate that an adequate substance abuse evaluation is extremely important and that brief self-report information may be misleading. Empirically derived assessment tools, such as the MMPI, may prove useful in allowing researchers to more accurately define control parameters and group membership.
