QTL analysis: unreliability and bias in estimation procedures
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
QTL estimates were not significantly improved either by using the expected, rather than the observed, marker positions or by using a dense map of markers rather than a sparse map, and factors which may affect accuracy and reliability of QTL mapping are considered.
Abstract
Several statistical methods which employ multiple marker data are currently available for the analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in experimental populations. Although comparable estimates of QTL location and effects have been obtained by these methods, using simulated and real data sets, their accuracy and reliability have not been extensively investigated. The present study specifically examines the merit of using F2 and doubled haploid populations for locating QTL and estimating their effects. Factors which may affect accuracy and reliability of QTL mapping, such as the number and position of the markers available, the accuracy of the marker locations and the size of the experimental population used, are considered. These aspects are evaluated for QTL of differing heritabilities and locations along the chromosome. A population of 300 F2 individuals and 150 doubled haploid lines gave estimates of QTL position and effect which were comparable, albeit extremely unreliable. Even for a QTL of high heritability (10%), the confidence interval was 35 cM. There was little increase in reliability to be obtained from using 300, rather than 200, F2 individuals and 100 doubled haploid lines gave similar results to 150. QTL estimates were not significantly improved either by using the expected, rather than the observed, marker positions or by using a dense map of markers rather than a sparse map. A QTL which was asymmetrically located in the linkage group resulted in inaccurate estimates of QTL position which were seriously biassed at low heritability of the QTL. In a population of 300 F2 individuals the bias increased from 4 cM to 20 cM, for a QTL with 10% and 2% heritability respectively.