Testing for non-response and sample selection bias in contingent valuation
Economics LettersPublished 1 January 1993
John C. Whitehead, Peter A. Groothuis, Glenn C. Blomquist
Citations193
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.76
SNIP0.98
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
We use a combination phone/mail survey to test for possible sample biases in contingent valuation. We find no sample selection bias but do find non-response bias. We show how failure to correct for non-response bias distorts aggregate benefit estimates.
Keywords
Decision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsMail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
6,895 Citations1982Earl Babbie, Don A. Dillman
Choice Reviews OnlineUsing surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method
4,247 Citations1989Price, Raymond
Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementValuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction
1,948 Citations1992Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch
Sociological Methods & ResearchThe Analysis of Social Science Data with Missing Values
1,023 Citations1989Roderick J. A. Little, Donald B. Rubin
The EM algorithm, a convenient method for computing maximum likelihood estimates in missing-data problems, is described and applied to two common models, the multivariate normal model for continuous data and the multinomial model for discrete data.
The Review of Economics and StatisticsEfficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-Ended" Contingent Valuation Surveys
613 Citations1987Trudy Ann Cameron, Michelle D. James
Sociological Methods & ResearchSelection Bias in Linear Regression, Logit and Probit Models
305 Citations1989Jeffrey A. Dubin, Douglas Rivers
Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementArbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts
242 Citations1992V. Kerry Smith
Land EconomicsExpanding Contingent Value Sample Estimates to Aggregate Benefit Estimates: Current Practices and Proposed Solutions
98 Citations1987John B. Loomis
Land EconomicsOverlooked Biases in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Some Considerations
95 Citations1987Steven F. Edwards, G. D. Anderson
OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Effect of alternative and reclaimed areas on the value of wetlands. Final report
1 Citations1990Glenn C. Blomquist, John C. Whitehead
