login

FURTHER INSIGHTS INTO THE MULTIPLE-SATISFACTIONS APPROACH FOR HUNTER MANAGEMENT

Published 1 January 1980
Daniel J. Decker, Trevor L. Brown, Ralph J. Gutiérrez
Citations108

TL;DR

The multiple-satisfactions approach was used to determine hunting satisfaction for deer hunters using the Arnot Forest, a controlled hunting area in central New York, and found five components of hunting satisfaction were found to be deficient when compared to an ideal.

Abstract

Abstmct: A multiple-satisfactions approach was used determine hunting satisfaction for deer hunters using the Arnot Forest, a controlled hunting area in central New York. A sample of these hunters was surveyed via mail questionnaire; 144 (73.5%) hunters responded. Among 12 potential components of hunting satisfaction in respondents' concept of an ideal sihation, to get outdoors and enjoy nature and to see deer or deer signs were of plimary importance, while to get shots at to use hunting skills, and to get away from everyday problems and get a chance relax were secondmy. Five components of hunting satisfaction were found be deficient when compared an ideal sih~ation: getting shots at deer, seeing deer or deer sign, trophy display, using hunting equipment, and using hunting skills. Highly satisfied hunters ranked getting out-of-doors the most important component of the hunt; minimally satisfied hunters ranked getting shots at deer highest. The greatest dissatisfactions were related harvesting game. We concluded that the multiple-satisfactions approach may prove most useful when used identifv (1) tvnes of hunters seekine similar satisfactions and (2) areas that best ~rovide those

Keywords

Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEnvironmental Science