Impact of Pre-Call Request Form and Gender Interaction on Response to a Mail Survey
Journal of Marketing ResearchPublished 1 February 1982
Jacob Hornik
Citations49
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score6.96
SNIP2.42
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The author investigates the effect of grammatical variations in telephone prenotification and interviewer/respondent gender interaction on mail survey response rate, speed, quality, and bias. The four experimental grammatical forms were expected to differ in the amount of pressure they seem to exert on the respondent to comply. Findings suggest that rhetorical elicitation modes in the pre-call/mail survey setting influence response rate and speed, particularly for female interviewers, and do not affect response quality.
Keywords
Social SciencesArts and Humanities
The American Journal of PsychologyThe Psychological Bulletin
4,254 Citations1904Judith P. Frankmann, Jeff Adams
This psychological bulletin to read is a very fan of this kind of book and one to remember is not only the PDF, but also the genre of the book.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General)Applied Linear Statistical Models.
2,299 Citations1975V. Barnett, John Neter +1 more
Public Opinion QuarterlyStimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires: A Review
401 Citations1975Arnold S. Linsky
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorUnderstanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests
380 Citations1975Herbert H. Clark, Peter Lucy
Journal of Marketing ResearchA Self-Perception Interpretation of the Effect of Monetary and Nonmonetary Incentives on Mail Survey Respondent Behavior
148 Citations1980Robert A. Hansen
Journal of Marketing ResearchBroadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys
103 Citations1976Michael J. Houston, Neil M. Ford
Journal of Marketing ResearchA Reassessment of the Effects of Appeals on Response to Mail Surveys
90 Citations1980Terry L. Childers, William M. Pride +1 more
Human Communication ResearchRELATIONAL COMMUNICATION: THEORY AND RESEARCH
82 Citations1977Malcolm R. Parks
Public Opinion QuarterlySome Sources of Interviewer Variance in Surveys
79 Citations1976John H. Freeman, Edgar W. Butler
Journal of Marketing ResearchInfluence of Preliminary Contact on Mail Returns
55 Citations1966James E. Stafford
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyRhetorical elicitation of agreement in persuasion.
51 Citations1972Dolf Zillmann
Journal of Marketing ResearchMore on Self-Perception Theory's Foot Technique in the Pre-Call/Mail Survey Setting
51 Citations1980Chris T. Allen, Charles D. Schewe +1 more
Journal of Marketing ResearchMeasures of Interviewer Bias and Variance
50 Citations1977Barbara A. Bailar, Leroy Bailey +1 more
PsychometrikaPower Function Charts for Specification of Sample Size in Analysis of Variance
42 Citations1958Leonard S. Feldt, M.W. Mahmoud
Journal of Marketing ResearchTime Cue and Time Perception Effect on Response to Mail Surveys
37 Citations1981Jacob Hornik
Public Health Reports (1896-1970)Effect of Interviewers' Sex on Interview Responses
26 Citations1968John Colombotos, Jack Elinson +1 more
Journal of MarketingHow to Double or Triple Mail-Survey Response Rates
23 Citations1977Marvin A. Jolson
Communication MonographsGrammatical variations in persuasion: Effectiveness of four forms of request in door‐to‐door solicitations for funds
22 Citations1979Joanne Cantor
Psychonomic ScienceEffectiveness of ingratiation tactics in a cover letter on mail questionnaire response
22 Citations1972Clyde Hendrick, Richard J. Borden +3 more
