Assessing sources of error in structural equation models: The effects of sample size, reliability, and model misspecification

Abstract

Abstract This study used Monte Carlo methods to investigate the accuracy and utility of estimators of overall error and error due to approximation in structural equation models. The effects of sample size, indicator reliabilities, and degree of misspecification were examined. The rescaled noncentrality parameter (McDonald & Marsh, 1990) was examined as a measure of approximation error, whereas the one‐ and two‐sample cross‐validation indices and a sample estimator of overall error (EFo) proposed by Browne and Cudeck (1989, 1993) were presented as measures of overall error. The rescaled noncentrality parameter and EFo provided extremely accurate estimates of the amounts of approximation and overall error, respectively. However, although models with errors of omission produced larger estimates of approximation and overall error, the presence of errors of inclusion had little or no effect on estimates of either type of error. The cross‐validation indices and sample estimator of overall error reached minimum values for the same model as an empirically derived measure of overall error only for models with large amounts of specification error. Implications for the use of these estimators in choosing among competing models were discussed.