When to combine group judgments and when not to in the analytic hierarchy process: A new method
Mathematical and Computer ModellingPublished 1 January 1988
Indrani Basak
Citations26
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In paired comparisons, the individuals in a number of groups giving their judgments are examined for agreement among themselves. Statistical methods are applied to see whether these groups are significantly different in giving their judgments or not. When individual judgments are homogeneous, a single matrix is obtained for all of them to obtain a common rank order and weights. Otherwise, separate matrices are estimated for significantly different group judgments. Two numerical examples are given to explain the methodologies developed in the paper.
Keywords
Decision SciencesMathematics
Wiley series in probability and statisticsLinear Statistical Inference and its Applications
10,509 Citations1973C. Radhakrishna Rao
INFORMS Journal on Applied AnalyticsThe Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications
1,337 Citations1986Fatemeh Zahedi
Journal of Mathematical PsychologyProcedures for synthesizing ratio judgements
809 Citations1983J. Aczél, Thomas L. Saaty
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
490 Citations1996David L. Olson
The Analytic Hierarchy Process is a technique for converting subjective assessments of relative importance into a set of weights that has proven to be very useful in assisting selection from a finite set of alternatives.
