login

Performance of six influenza rapid tests in detecting human influenza in clinical specimens

Journal of Clinical VirologyPublished 24 April 2007
Aeron C. Hurt, Robert Alexander, Jan Hibbert, N. Deed, Ian Barr
Citations241
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.19
SNIP0.90

TL;DR

A head-to-head comparison for the detection of seasonal influenza types A and B, compared to laboratory-based tests found sensitivity was considerably lower than that seen for influenza A, although the number of specimens containing influenza B viruses was low.

Abstract

Compared with cell culture, five of the rapid tests (Binax Now Influenza A&B, Directigen EZ Flu A+B, Denka Seiken Quick Ex-Flu, Fujirebio Espline Influenza A&B-N, and Quidel QuickVue Influenza A+B Test) demonstrated a similar influenza A sensitivity of between 67-71% and a specificity of 99-100%, however one rapid test (Rockeby Influenza A Antigen Test) had a significantly lower influenza A sensitivity of only 10% (specificity was 100%). For the five kits that detected influenza B antigen, sensitivity was considerably lower than that seen for influenza A (sensitivity for all the kits was 30%), although the number of specimens containing influenza B viruses was low.

Keywords

Medicine