Persuasion as ethical argument
Rhetoric ReviewPublished 1 September 1985
Irvin Hashimoto
Citations4
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.20
SNIP0.64
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
You are, at the least, obliged not to be ignorant, not to be dogmatic, not to be arrogant. You must explain fully, offer carefully collected evidence, and reason logically. You must disavow coercion, manipulation, and image-making. You must welcome, not threaten; disclose, not deceive; be generous, not hostile. You must, in your argument, make a common world, with room in it for yourself and your reader. (231)
Keywords
Social SciencesHealth Professions
Macat Library eBooksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions
5,423 Citations2017Jo Hedesan, Joseph Tendler
Educational and Psychological MeasurementCognitive Styles: What Are They?
168 Citations1980J. P. Guilford
Speaking Persuasively
8 Citations2020Patsy McCarthy, Caroline Hatcher
Strategies of Rhetoric: With Handbook
3 Citations1983A. M. Tibbetts, Charlene Tibbetts
This book discusses preparing to write, handling major assignments, improving and revising papers, and special problems: avoiding writer's block writing with a word processor writing essay exams.
