Newspaper coverage of diseases and actual mortality statistics
European Journal of Social PsychologyPublished 1 April 1983
Connie M. Kristiansen
Citations27
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.45
SNIP1.44
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
There was no correspondence between the press's coverage of disease and mortality statistics and the actual mortality statistics for these diseases were compared.
Abstract
Abstract The number of newspaper articles about various diseases and the amount of attention given to these diseases by 7 British national daily newspapers were compared with the actual mortality statistics for these diseases. Spearman rank correlations showed that there was no correspondence between the press's coverage of disease and mortality statistics.
Keywords
Medicine
Cognitive PsychologyAvailability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
9,943 Citations1973Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
Annual Review of PsychologyBehavioral Decision Theory
1,714 Citations1977Paul Slovic, Baruch Fischhoff +1 more
Cognitive PsychologyAn analysis of the word-superiority effect
350 Citations1973Jonathan Baron, Ian Thurston
Journalism QuarterlyAttention Score: A Device for Measuring News ‘Play’
58 Citations1964Richard W. Budd
