Internsʼ Self-evaluations Compared with Their Facultyʼs Evaluations
Academic MedicinePublished 1 July 2000
Susan C. Zonia, Manfred Stommel
Citations26
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.45
SNIP2.03
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Compared the evaluations that interns made of themselves with those made by their faculty, the accuracy with which individuals evaluate and judge their knowledge and skills was compared.
Abstract
The accuracy with which individuals evaluate and judge their knowledge and skills is an important component of adult and life-long learning. This study compared the evaluations that interns made of themselves with those made by their faculty.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Academic MedicineA review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training
532 Citations1991Michael J. Gordon
The validity of self-assessed performance was found to be low to moderate and did not improve with time in conventional health professions training programs, but effective training to improve validity and accuracy is available and feasible.
Academic MedicinePredicting supervisor, peer, and self ratings of intern performance
53 Citations1975P Kegel-Flom
Academic MedicineReinforcement of self-directed learning and the development of professional attitudes through peer- and self-assessment
40 Citations1998Elizabeth Asch, D Saltzberg +1 more
Academic MedicineTeaching professionalism through tutorial discussions of literature–stories, poems, and essays
7 Citations1998Steven R. Ytterberg, Gregory A. Plotnikoff +1 more