What I Don't Recall Can't Hurt Me: Information Negativity Versus Information Inconsistency As Determinants of Memorial Self-defense
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
According to the mnemic neglect model, people are threatened by feedback that has unfavorable implications for their central self-aspects, and, as a result, they recall it poorly. What is the locus of such poor recall (i.e., mnemic neglect)? Experiment 1 examined the role of information inconsistency. If mnemic neglect is due to expectancy violation, then it will be observed for any referent (e.g., self, friend, glowingly-described other) controlling for expectancy positivity. Mnemic neglect was obtained for the self but not a friend or a glowingly-described other. Experiment 2 disentangled the roles of information inconsistency and information negativity. Participants with positive and those with negative self-concepts both manifested mnemic neglect. Negative, rather than inconsistent, feedback drives mnemic neglect.
