Comment: Estimating the Effects Caused by Treatments
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationPublished 1 March 1984
Paul R. Rosenbaum, Donald B. Rubin
Citations32
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score4.10
SNIP3.08
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
(1984). Comment: Estimating the Effects Caused by Treatments. Journal of the American Statistical Association: Vol. 79, No. 385, pp. 26-28.
Keywords
MathematicsEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
BiometrikaThe central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
30,963 Citations1983Paul R. Rosenbaum, Donald B. Rubin
Journal of Educational PsychologyEstimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
9,471 Citations1974Donald B. Rubin
The Annals of StatisticsBayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization
2,540 Citations1978Donald B. Rubin
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory
1,546 Citations1979A. P. Dawid
Journal of Educational StatisticsAssignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate
1,170 Citations1977Donald B. Rubin
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome
1,134 Citations1983Peter Rosenbaum, Donald B. Rubin
A method for assessing the sensitivity of causal conclusions to an unmeasured patient characteristic relevant to both treatment assignment and response from observational studies with a binary outcome and an observed categorical covariate is proposed.
Cambridge University Press eBooksControlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review
986 Citations2006William G. Cochran
Work on the effectiveness of different methods of matched sampling and statistical adjustment, alone and in combination, in reducing bias due to confounding x-variables when comparing two populations is reviewed.
Psychological BulletinA paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons.
608 Citations1967Frederic M. Lord
It is common practice in behavioral research, and in other areas, to apply the analysis of covariance in the investigation of preexisting natural groups to rule out the possibility that observed differences in the dependent variable might logically be caused by Differences in the independent variable.
American Journal of EpidemiologyCHOOSING THE PARAMETER FOR A 2 × 2 TABLE OR A 2 × 2 × 2 TABLE ANALYSIS
65 Citations1979Martin A. Hamilton
It is shown that prior information about the correct population model is required to adequately measure synergism and four 2 x 2 table measures of association are compared.