Testing! testing! one, two, three – Testing the theory in structural equation models!
Personality and Individual DifferencesPublished 22 December 2006
Leslie A. Hayduk, Greta G. Cummings, Kwame Boadu, Hannah Pazderka, Shelley Boulianne
Citations355
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.42
SNIP1.34
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Barrett (2007) presents minor revisions to statements previously posted on Barrett’s website, and discussed on SEMNET (a web discussion group about structural equation modeling). Unfortunately, Barrett’s “recommendations” remain seriously statistically and methodologially flawed. Unlike Barrett, we see scientific value in reporting models that challenge or discredit theories. We critique Barrett’s way of proceeding in the context of both especially small and large samples, and we urge greater attention to the χ2 significance test.
Keywords
Decision Sciences
Journal of Wildlife ManagementModel Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach
42,130 Citations2003Fred S. Guthery, Kenneth P. Burnham +1 more
The second edition of this book is unique in that it focuses on methods for making formal statistical inference from all the models in an a priori set (Multi-Model Inference).
Personality and Individual DifferencesStructural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit
2,518 Citations2006Paul Barrett
Psychological BulletinOverall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects.
864 Citations1990Kenneth A. Bollen
Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsLISREL Issues, Debates and Strategies
321 Citations1997Richard Williams, Leslie A. Hayduk
BMC Medical Research MethodologyStructural equation model testing and the quality of natural killer cell activity measurements
258 Citations2005Leslie A. Hayduk, Hannah Pazderka +3 more
Psychological MethodsWhen fit indices and residuals are incompatible.
192 Citations2002Michael W. Browne, Robert C. MacCallum +3 more
Psychological MethodsWhen fit indices and residuals are incompatible.
191 Citations2002Michael W. Browne, Robert C. MacCallum +3 more
A theoretical explanation for this phenomenon is provided using relationships between unique variances and eigenvalues of the fitted correlation matrix.
Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary JournalJiving the Four-Step, Waltzing Around Factor Analysis, and Other Serious Fun
176 Citations2000Leslie A. Hayduk, Dale Glaser
Sociological Methods & ResearchThe Effect of Skewness and Kurtosis on Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis
156 Citations2005Ke‐Hai Yuan, Peter M. Bentler +1 more
Nursing ResearchIs the Nursing Work Index Measuring Up?
62 Citations2006Greta G. Cummings, Leslie A. Hayduk +1 more
Each of the three underlying measurement models was factor analytic in design and failed significantly when compared with the data and raises questions about the validity of these instruments as measures of the nursing practice environment.
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportementPersonal space: The conceptual and measurement implications of structural equation models.
32 Citations1985Leslie A. Hayduk
Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary JournalDoing the Four-Step, Right-2-3, Wrong-2-3: A Brief Reply to Mulaik and Millsap; Bollen; Bentler; and Herting and Costner
19 Citations2000Leslie A. Hayduk, Dale Glaser
