Do U.S. Firms Invest Less in Human Resources?: Training in the World Auto Industry
Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and SocietyPublished 1 April 1995
John Paul MacDuffie, Thomas A. Kochan
Citations178
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.93
SNIP1.32
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
We investigate the common assertion that U.S. firms invest less in human resources than key international competitors, testing four alternative explanations for differences in training effort found in survey data from an international sample of fifty‐seven automobile assembly plants. We find the strongest support for the view that the level of training is derived from the requirements of the business/production strategy and the overall “bundle” of human resource policies—beyond training—adopted by the firm.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and FinanceBusiness, Management and Accounting
Management ScienceStrategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
5,535 Citations1986Jay B. Barney
Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewHuman Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry
3,725 Citations1995John Paul MacDuffie
Foreign AffairsThe Second Industrial Divide
3,296 Citations1985William Diebold, Michael J. Piore +1 more
Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewThe Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills
881 Citations1992Jeffrey B. Arthur
Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewThe Impact on Economic Performance of a Transformation in Workplace Relations
295 Citations1991Joel Cutcher‐Gershenfeld
California Management ReviewNew Technologies, New Skills
158 Citations1986Paul S. Adler
It is demonstrated that a careful assessment of the type of responsibility, degree of abstractness, and nature of interdependence will prove valuable for the manager if the assessment is clouded by uncertainty, and the most useful guiding assumption is that optimal performance demands more responsibility for results, more intellectual mastery and abstract skills, and more carefully nurtured interDependence.
Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewAre Skill Requirements Rising? Evidence from Production and Clerical Jobs
112 Citations1993Peter Cappelli
DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Beyond mass production--flexible production systems and manufacturing performance in thw world auto industry
38 Citations1991John Paul MacDuffie
Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and SocietyUnionization and Job Design Under Programmable Automation
21 Citations1989Maryellen R. Kelley
Skill and Occupational Changes in U.S. Manufacturing
19 Citations1992Paul Attewell
Issues in Skill Formation in Japanese Approaches to Automation
9 Citations1992Robert E. Cole
Japan’s Version of Managerial Capitalism
8 Citations1992Ronald Dore
