login

Comparison of decision tree methods for finding active objects

Advances in Space ResearchPublished 27 July 2007Open access
Yongheng Zhao, Yanxia Zhang
Citations340
View PDF

TL;DR

Several kinds of decision trees for finding active objects by multi-wavelength data, such as REPTree, Random Tree, Decision Stump, Random Forest, J48, NBTree, AdTree are described and experimental results show that ADTree is the best only in terms of accuracy.

Abstract

The automated classification of objects from large catalogues or survey\nprojects is an important task in many astronomical surveys. Faced with various\nclassification algorithms, astronomers should select the method according to\ntheir requirements. Here we describe several kinds of decision trees for\nfinding active objects by multi-wavelength data, such as REPTree, Random Tree,\nDecision Stump, Random Forest, J48, NBTree, AdTree. All decision tree\napproaches investigated are in the WEKA package. The classification performance\nof the methods is presented. In the process of classification by decision tree\nmethods, the classification rules are easily obtained, moreover these rules are\nclear and easy to understand for astronomers. As a result, astronomers are\ninclined to prefer and apply them, thus know which attributes are important to\ndiscriminate celestial objects. The experimental results show that when various\ndecision trees are applied in discriminating active objects (quasars, BL Lac\nobjects and active galaxies) from non-active objects (stars and galaxies),\nADTree is the best only in terms of accuracy, Decision Stump is the best only\nconsidering speed, J48 is the optimal choice considering both accuracy and\nspeed.\n

Keywords

EngineeringPhysics and Astronomy