Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice: Philosophy Through a Wide-Angle Lens
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of MedicinePublished 27 October 2017Open access
Janet Malek
Citations3
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.66
SNIP1.11
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Philosophers who specialize in bioethics (broadly defined to include health care ethics, clinical ethics, public health ethics, and research ethics among other applied fields) face a distinctive set of challenges in our work: to bring the theoretical insights of philosophical work and methodology to practical dilemmas affecting a diverse group of stakeholders every day. This article describes some of the key contributions that philosophy can make to the field of bioethics. It also identifies some of the pitfalls that can undermine the value of a philosophical approach when used to analyze questions arising in the real world. Recognition of the importance of individual context, practical implications, and social considerations can help successfully bridge the gap between theory and practice. Using this wide-angle lens to view bioethical problems can enable philosophers working in our field to offer insights that are both rigorous and relevant.
Keywords
MedicineHealth ProfessionsNeuroscience
44. Reasons and Persons
4,287 Citations2015Derek Parfit
Annals of Internal MedicineMedical Futility: Its Meaning and Ethical Implications
1,193 Citations1990Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Nancy S. Jecker +1 more
It is submitted that physicians can judge a treatment to be futile and are entitled to withhold a procedure on this basis and should act in concert with other health care professionals, but need not obtain consent from patients or family members.
New England Journal of MedicineActive and Passive Euthanasia
801 Citations1975James Rachels
The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis and it is suggested that the American Medical Association policy statement that endorses this doctrine is unsound.
The Foundations of Bioethics
683 Citations1996H. Tristram Engelhardt
A Defense of Abortion
602 Citations1976Judith Jarvis Thomson
New England Journal of MedicineEthics and Communication in Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders
269 Citations1988Tom Tomlinson, H. Brody
Despite the extensive literature devoted to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, they continue to raise vexing problems for physicians, house staff, nurses, and policy makers.
Annals of Internal MedicineBrain Death: Reconciling Definitions, Criteria, and Tests
232 Citations1993Amir Halevy, Baruch Brody
The Uniform Determination of Death Act provided the legal articulation of the whole-brain criterion of death as irreversible cessation of all functions of the brain, including the brainstem.
PubMedAdvance directives and the personal identity problem.
133 Citations1988Allen Buchanan
It is concluded that cases of permanent unconsciousness and neurological dementia destroy some of the preconditions for personhood and thereby negate the choice between respecting the wishes of the formerly competent person and the new, different person's life because such beings are not persons at all.
Journal of Medical EthicsBioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress
72 Citations2014Julian Savulescu
It is argued that both bioethics and medical ethics together have, in many ways, failed as fields, and why philosophical analysis and argument remain as important as ever to progress in bioethICS and medical Ethics.
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of MedicineSerial Participation and the Ethics of Phase 1 Healthy Volunteer Research
37 Citations2017Rebecca L. Walker, Marci D. Cottingham +1 more
Concerns about phase 1 trials as they have been framed in the bioethics literature are reviewed, and the ethical significance of structurally diminished voluntariness, routine powerlessness in setting the terms of exchange, and incentive structures that may promote pharmaceutical interests but encourage phase 1 healthy volunteers to skirt important rules are argued.
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of MedicineThe Ethics of General Population Preventive Genomic Sequencing: Rights and Social Justice
17 Citations2017Clair Morrissey, Rebecca L. Walker
It is concluded that traditional clinical and public health ethics frameworks should be complemented by a social justice perspective in order adequately to characterize the ethical dimensions of general population PGS programs.
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of MedicineChromosome Screening Using Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Beyond Trisomy-21: What to Screen for and Why It Matters
9 Citations2017Kristien Hens
It is argued that the current state of the art of NIPT is already in need of a thorough ethical investigation and that there are different points to consider before any chromosomal or subchromosomal condition is added to the screening panel of a publicly funded screening program.
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of MedicineTwo Ways to Kill a Patient
8 Citations2017Ben Bronner
It is argued that killing (and causing death) can be understood in either of two ways, and given the relevant understanding, the Standard View is insulated from typical criticisms.
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of MedicineSchemata, CONSORT, and the Salk Polio Vaccine Trial
6 Citations2017Charles J. Kowalski, Adam J. Mrdjenovich
It is argued that large-scale public health interventions often require evidence beyond simple efficacy, the limit of what an RCT can provide, and that the design actually adopted for the Salk trial represented a reasonable- albeit imperfect-compromise.