Field Dependence and Memory for Relevant and Irrelevant Incidental Stimuli
Perceptual and Motor SkillsPublished 1 December 1966
Morris N. Eagle, David J. Fitzgibbons, Leo Goldberger
Citations32
SJR quartileQ3
SJR score0.61
SNIP0.84
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
On the basis of previous work, it was hypothesized that field-independent Ss would show better incidental memory for task-relevant stimuli, while field-dependent Ss would better remember incidentally presented task-irrelevant social cues. Only the former was supported by the results. It is possible that the latter depends upon the social context of the interaction between subject and experimenter.
Keywords
Neuroscience
Journal of Abnormal & Social PsychologyCognitive styles and memory for faces.
98 Citations1964Samuel Messick, Fred Damarin
Accuracy in the incidental recall of photographed human faces can be predicted from the S's cognitive styles and biases: Ss who were field dependent on an embedded-figures test recalled more faces correctly than did the field independent.
Perceptual and Motor SkillsField Dependence and Memory for Incidental Material
81 Citations1965David J. Fitzgibbons, Leo Goldberger +1 more
Although field-dependent Ss performed significantly more poorly on the focal task than field-independent Ss, recall and recognition was independent of performance on the focussed task.
PsycEXTRA DatasetPerceptual Performance And The Effective Person
80 Citations1958Richard S. Crutchfield, Donald G. Woodworth +1 more