login

The Problem with Futility

New England Journal of MedicinePublished 4 June 1992
Robert D. Truog, Allan S. Brett, Joel Frader
Citations465
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score19.08
SNIP13.47

TL;DR

"Futility" is one of the newest additions to the lexicon of bioethics and physicians, ethicists, and members of the media are increasingly concerned about patients and families who insist on receiving palliative care.

Abstract

...The notion of futility generally fails to provide an ethically\ncoherent ground for limiting life-sustaining treatment, except in\ncircumstances in which narrowly defined physiologic futility can be plausibly\ninvoked. Futility has been conceptualized as an objecitve entity independent\nof the patient's or surrogate's perspective, but differences in values and the\nvariable probabilities of clinical outcomes undermine its basis. Furthermore,\nassertions of futility may camouflage judgments of comparative worth that are\nimplicit in debates about the allocation of resources. In short, the problem\nwith futility is that its promise of objectivity can rarely be fulfilled. The\nrapid advance of the language of futility into the jargon of bioethics should\nbe followed by an equally rapid retreat.

Keywords

MedicineHealth Professions