Buyers' and Sellers' Explanations for Product Failure: Who Done It?
Journal of MarketingPublished 1 April 1986
Valerie S. Folkes, Barbara Kotsos
Citations174
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score13.39
SNIP5.22
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Buyers and sellers read descriptions of a product failure and were asked to explain why it occurred. When sellers explained failures of products they themselves offered, they tended to find fault with the product itself less often than did consumers. Discrepancies in buyer-seller attributions were related to estimates of how commonly the product fails, suggesting that consensus information may be one source of buyer-seller differences.
Keywords
Decision SciencesBusiness, Management and Accounting
Cognitive PsychologyAvailability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
9,943 Citations1973Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
Journal of Consumer ResearchConsumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach
1,313 Citations1984Valerie S. Folkes
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyHypothesis-testing processes in social interaction.
910 Citations1978Mark Snyder, William B. Swann
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPerseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information.
718 Citations1980Craig A. Anderson, Mark R. Lepper +1 more
Journal of Social IssuesConsumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior
377 Citations1991H. Keith Hunt
Journal of Consumer ResearchPost-Purchase Consumer Processes and the Complaining Consumer
317 Citations1982Mary C. Gilly, Betsy D. Gelb
Psychological BulletinMotivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis.
294 Citations1981Jerry M. Burger
Law & Society ReviewConsumer Response to Unsatisfactory Purchases: A Survey of Perceiving Defects, Voicing Complaints, and Obtaining Redress
274 Citations1977Arthur Best, Alan R. Andreasen
Journal of Social IssuesCoping with Victimization: Conclusions and Implications for Future Research
121 Citations1983Camille B. Wortman
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyAn information-processing approach to attribution of responsibility
98 Citations1977Marilynn B. Brewer
Journal of MarketingConsumer Complaints and Managerial Response: A Holistic Approach
90 Citations1983Alan J. Resnik, Robert R. Harmon
Journal of Consumer AffairsPerceptual Differences in Market Transactions Revisited: A Waning Source of Consumer Frustration
7 Citations1981Ronald J. Dornoff, F. Robert Dwyer
