"Naturally" Without Gender: Women, Jurisdiction, and the Federal Courts
Yale Law School Legal Scholarship RepositoryPublished 1 January 1991Open access
Judith Resnik
Citations13
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
For many years, women who work (or who have tried to work) with law and in courts have understood that their gender was relevant to that work. However, until recently, those who run the courts to which women have sought entry have not been interested in the effects of women on courts and of courts on women. Below, Professor Resnik explores the relationship between women and the federal courts and the role that gender plays in the allocation of work between state and federal courts.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Choice Reviews OnlineAs we forgive our debtors: bankruptcy and consumer credit in America
211 Citations1990
Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository"One United People": Second-Class Female Citizenship and the American Quest for Community
68 Citations1989Rogers M. Smith
Yale Law School Legal Scholarship RepositoryA Neo-Federalist View of Article III: Separating the Two Tiers of Federal Jurisdiction
39 Citations1985Akhil Reed Amar
Duke Law JournalThe Supreme Court and Litigation Access Fees: The Right to Protect One's Rights. Part I
22 Citations1974Frank I. Michelman
