Expanding Relevance Feedback in the Relational Model.
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
In TREC 6, the relevance feedback methodology was expanded to include additional term weighting methods as well as feedback term scaling, and the relevance ranking scores between documents and queries could be improved by eliminating certain highly weighted terms.
Abstract
In TREC-6, we participated in both the automatic and manual tracks for category A. For the automatic runs, we used the short versions of the queries and enhanced our existing prototype by expanding the relevance feedback methodology to include additional term weighting methods (i.e., the typical “ltc-lnc ” or “nidf ” weights) as well as feedback term scaling. We also experimented with eliminating infrequently occurring terms to determine if the relevance ranking scores between documents and queries could be improved by eliminating certain highly weighted terms. For our manual runs, we used pre-defined concept lists with terms from the concept lists combined in different ways. We continued to use the AT&T DBC-1012 Model 4 parallel database machine as the platform for our information retrieval system which continues to be implemented in the relational database model using unchanged SQL.
