Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized
SciencePublished 1 February 1980
William Raft Kunst-Wilson, Robert B. Zajonc
Citations1,199
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score10.42
SNIP6.62
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Experimental evidence is presented that these preferences can develop even when the exposures are so degraded that recognition is precluded and animal and human subjects readily develop strong preferences for objects that have become familiar through repeated exposures.
Abstract
Animal and human subjects readily develop strong preferences for objects that have become familiar through repeated exposures. Experimental evidence is presented that these preferences can develop even when the exposures are so degraded that recognition is precluded.
Keywords
PsychologyNeuroscience
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAttitudinal effects of mere exposure.
6,649 Citations1968Robert B. Zajonc
Journal of Experimental PsychologyDepth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory.
434 Citations1974Gordon H. Bower, Martin B. Karlin
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal BehaviorEffects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation
308 Citations1963Norman H. Anderson, Stephen Hubert
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & MemoryWhen face recognition fails.
251 Citations1977Karalyn Patterson, Alan Baddeley
Two studies investigated recognition of pictures of faces, focusing on the effects of changes in appearance of the face from presentation to test and type of processing or encoding.
SciencePerception of Letters in Words: Seek Not and Ye Shall Find
157 Citations1974James C. Johnston, James L. McClelland
Subjects perceive a letter in a briefly presented word more accurately when they attend to the whole word than when they focus their attention on just the letter they want to see.
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyIs stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure effects?
145 Citations1977Richard L. Moreland, Robert B. Zajonc
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyCombining visual and verbal information in an impression-formation task.
138 Citations1968Anita K. Lampel, Norman H. Anderson
Results supported theHYPOTHESIS that the 2 Subjectives were SIMPLY AVERAGED to get together, but there was a strong interaction between them and the photographer.
ScienceVisual Evoked Response Correlates of Unconscious Mental Processes
98 Citations1968Howard Shevrin, Dean E. Fritzler
The results indicate that the effects of subliminal perception are encoded in the average evoked response and also influence the content of free associations.
British Journal of PsychologyEXPOSURE FREQUENCY AND STIMULUS PREFERENCE
25 Citations1973P. Nicholas Hamid
Low meaning and short exposures were found to significantly enhance the frequency-affect relationship and different orientations to novel versus repetitive stimulation were clearly evident in the preference functions in Expts.
Journal of Experimental Psychology GeneralSelective inattention to anxiety-linked stimuli.
23 Citations1979Gerald S. Blum, John S. Barbour
The results indicated that both low perceivability and high solvability increase the likelihood of response delays specifically in the presence of anxiety-linked stimuli.