Intramuscular Pressure and Electromyography in the Supraspinatus Muscle at Shoulder Abduction

Both methods showed an equally good correlation with external shoulder force, IMP gives as good an estimation of relative muscle force as EMG, but any comparison between EMG and IMP must be done at the same muscle length.

Abstract

In ergonomic and biomechanic research, estimations of shoulder muscle load and evaluation of different measuring techniques are important. Intramuscular pressure (IMP), using the microcapillary infusion technique and bipolar intramuscular electromyography (EMG), was recorded from the same part of the supraspinatus muscle. In 12 subjects, IMP and EMG were recorded at shoulder abduction angles of 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 135 degrees with no or a 1- or 2-kg hand load in each position. The shoulder torque was calculated for each test position. A correlation was found for both mean IMP and mean EMG versus shoulder torque if the position with extreme muscle shortening (135 degrees abduction) was excluded. IMP was high (greater than 50 mmHg) in almost all test situations. In seven other subjects, isometric force in abduction was correlated with IMP and EMG. Both methods showed an equally good correlation with external shoulder force, IMP gives as good an estimation of relative muscle force as EMG, but any comparison between EMG and IMP must be done at the same muscle length.