login

Lipid Formulations for Amphotericin B: Does the Emperor Need New Clothes?

Annals of Internal MedicinePublished 15 May 1996
John R. Graybill
Citations44
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score3.38
SNIP3.27

TL;DR

Although the three defined preparations clearly reduce nephrotoxicity, they are not licensed in the United States, and use of these drugs has been significantly limited by their costs, which may reach $500 to $1000 per day for doses of 5 mg/kg.

Abstract

Editorials15 May 1996Lipid Formulations for Amphotericin B: Does the Emperor Need New Clothes?John R. Graybill, MDJohn R. Graybill, MDUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78284Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-124-10-199605150-00011 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail For many years, the polyene amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMBd) has been the emperor of systemic antifungal therapy. Unfortunately, the great efficacy of amphotericin B has been matched by substantial toxicity. Efforts to develop less toxic alternatives to AMBd have focused on repackaging amphotericin B in new clothes, that is, lipid vehicles. These vehicles have been designed to target sites of fungal infection but spare the kidneys [1-5]. In general, lipid-associated amphotericin B preparations achieve lower renal concentrations than does AMBd, and they are concentrated in reticuloendothelial tissues such as the liver and spleen. Pharmacokinetics variables, including tissue distribution and clearance, ...References1. Schmitt HJ. New methods of delivery of amphotericin B. Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 17(Suppl 2):S501-6. Google Scholar2. de Marie S, Janknegt R, Bakker-Woudenberg IA. Clinical use of liposomal and lipid-complexed amphotericin B. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994; 33:907-16. Google Scholar3. Sanders SW, Buchi KN, Goddard MS, Lang JK, Tolman KG. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerance of a cholesteryl sulfate complex of amphotericin B administered to healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991; 35:1029-34. Google Scholar4. Janknegt R, de Marie S, Bakker-Woudenberg IA, Crommelin DJA. Liposomal and lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Clinical pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992; 23:279-91. Google Scholar5. Collette N, Van der Auwera P, Meunier F, Lambert C, Sculier JP, Coune A. Tissue distribution and bioactivity of amphotericin B administered in liposomes to cancer patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991; 27:535-48. Google Scholar6. Meunier F, Prentice HG, Ringden O. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome): safety data from a phase II/III clinical trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991; 28(Suppl B):83-91. Google Scholar7. Ringden O, Andstrom E, Remberger M, Svahn BM, Tollemar J. Safety of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in 187 transplant recipients treated with cyclosporin. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991; 14(Suppl 5):S10-4. Google Scholar8. Walsh TJ, Hiemenz J, Seibel E, Anaissie EJ. Amphotericin B lipid complex in the treatment of 228 cases of invasive mycosis [Abstract]. In: Thirty-fourth Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Orlando, FL; October 1994. Google Scholar9. Mills W, Chopra R, Linch DC, Goldstone AH. Liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of fungal infections in neutropenic patients: a single-centre experience of 133 episodes in 116 patients. Br J Haematol. 1991; 86:754-60. Google Scholar10. Ringden O, Meunier F, Tollemar J, Ricci P, Tura S, Kuse E, et al. Efficacy of amphotericin B encapsulated in liposomes (AmBisome) in the treatment of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991; 28(Suppl B):73-82. Google Scholar11. Viviani MA, Rizzardini G, Tortorano AM, Fasan M, Capetti A, Roverselli AM, et al. Lipid-based amphotericin B in the treatment of cryptococcosis. Infection. 1994; 22:137-84. Google Scholar12. Lopez-Berestein G, Fainstein V, Hopfer R, Mehta K, Sullivan MP, Keating M, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of systemic fungal infections in patients with cancer: a preliminary study. J Infect Dis. 1985; 151:704-10. Google Scholar13. Sharkey PK, Graybill JR, Johnson ES, Hansrath SG, Pollard RB, Kolokathis A, et al. Amphotericin B lipid complex compared with amphotericin B in the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 1996; 22:315-21. Google Scholar14. Sharkey PK, Lipke R, Renteria A, Galgiani J, Catanzaro A, Diaz M, et al. Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) in treatment (RX) of coccidioidomycosis (C) [Abstract]. In: Thirty-first Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Chicago; 1991. Google Scholar15. Hostetler JS, Caldwell JW, Johnson RH, Munoz AD, Einstein HE, Larsen RA, et al. Coccidioidal infections treated with amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (Amphocil or ABCD) [Abstract]. In: Thirty-second Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Anaheim, CA; October 1992. Google Scholar16. Dietze R, Milan EP, Berman JD, Grogl M, Falqueto A, Feitosa TF, et al. Treatment of Brazilian kala-azar with a short course of amphocil (amphotericin B cholesterol dispersion). Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 17:981-6. Google Scholar17. Coker RJ, Viviani M, Gazzard BG, Du Pont B, Pohle HD, Murphy SM, et al. Treatment of cryptococcosis with liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in 23 patients with AIDS. AIDS. 1993; 7:829-35. Google Scholar18. Anaissie EJ, White M, Uzun O, Singer C, Bodey GP, Matzke D, et al. Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) versus amphotericin B (AMB) for the treatment of hematogenous invasive candidiasis: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial [Abstract]. In: Thirty-fifth Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. San Francisco, CA; September 1995. Google Scholar19. Tollemar J, Ringden O, Andersson S, Sundberg B, Ljungman P, Tyden G. Randomized double-blind study of liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome) prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1993; 12:577-82. Google Scholar20. Tollemar J, Hockerstedt K, Ericzon BG, Jalanko H, Ringden O. Liposomal amphotericin B prevents invasive fungal infections in liver transplant recipients. A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Transplantation. 1995; 59:45-50. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78284Corresponding Author: John R. Graybill, MD, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78284. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited ByAmphotericin B deoxycholate versus liposomal amphotericin B: effects on kidney functionAmphiphilic alginate as a drug release vehicle for water-insoluble drugsDrug–Nutrient InteractionsNew perspectives for leishmaniasis chemotherapy over current anti-leishmanial drugs: a patent landscapeSolubilization of Water-Insoluble Drugs Due to Random Amphiphilic and Degradable Poly(dimethylmalic acid) DerivativesAmphotericin B deoxycholate versus liposomal amphotericin B: effects on kidney functionAntiparasitic effects of gold nanoparticles with microwave radiation on promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania majorAspergillosis: A Disease of Modern TechnologyAntifungal Agents and Antifungal Susceptibility TestingCombination Antifungal Therapy for Invasive Mold Infections Involving PolyenesHistory of AntifungalsAmphotericin B for cryptococcal meningitis in HIV positive patients: Low dose versus high doseLipid formulations of amphotericin B: where are we today?Drug–Nutrient InteractionsUpdate on antifungal therapyAspergillosisInvasive Aspergillosis Disease Spectrum, Treatment Practices, and OutcomesAmphotericin B preparations: a maximum tolerated dose in severe invasive fungal infections?Use of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion in ChildrenIntroduction to Antifungal DrugsAmphotericin B colloidal dispersionComparison of the Toxicity of Amphotericin B in 5% Dextrose with That of Amphotericin B in Fat Emulsion in a Randomized Trial with Cancer PatientsAntifungal Agents. Part I. Amphotericin B Preparations and FlucytosineFebrile Neutropenie: Praktische AspekteAntifungals: mechanism of action and resistance, established and novel drugsPolymeric micelles for drug delivery: solubilization and haemolytic activity of amphotericin BLiposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) compared with amphotericin B both followed by oral fluconazole in the treatment of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitisAntibiotic treatment of systemic fungal infectionsAntifungal treatment in patients with cancerAmphotéricine B déoxycholate (Fungizone®): vieux médicament, nouvelles versions 15 May 1996Volume 124, Issue 10Page: 921-923KeywordsAmphotericinAspergillosisCandidiasisCerebrospinal fluidCoccidioidomycosisCryptococcosisDrugsLipidsMycosesToxicity Issue Published: 15 May 1996 CopyrightCopyright © 1996 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF DownloadLoading ...

Keywords

Agricultural and Biological SciencesMedicine