Citation as effortful voting: A reply to ones, Brinn and Pendlebury
OmegaPublished 1 October 1996
John R. Doyle, Alan Arthurs, Laurie McAulay, P.G. Osborne
Citations22
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.31
SNIP2.20
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This note rehearses and develops the arguments of an earlier paper by Doyle and Arthurs [Omega, 23, 257–270 (1995)] in response to comments by Jones et al. [Omega 24, 597–602].
Keywords
Arts and Humanities
OmegaJudging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study
57 Citations1995John R. Doyle, Alan Arthurs
OmegaThe judge, the model of the judge, and the model of the judged as judge: Analyses of the UK 1992 research assessment exercise data for business and management studies
41 Citations1996John R. Doyle, Alan Arthurs +5 more
OmegaJudging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accounting
34 Citations1996Michael John Jones, Tony Brinn +1 more