Sex‐Biased Harvesting and Population Dynamics in Ungulates: Implications for Conservation and Sustainable Use
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
It is shown that the interaction between sperm limita- tion and harvests with highly male-biased sex ratios can lead to greatly reduced female fecundity and population collapse and suggest that present methods of harvest- ing may not be optimal, or viable, in the long term.
Abstract
The consumptive use of wildlife, in particular trophy hunting and game ranching of ungulates, has been advocated as a tool for conservation in Africa. We show that these methods of harvesting differ significantly from natural predation, with trophy hunting showing extreme selection for adult males and game ranching leading to disproportionate harvests of young males. Little information, either theoretical or empirical, exists concerning the effect of these harvesting regimes on the long‐term population dynamics of ungulate populations. Despite that, the potential effects of sex‐skewed harvests are numerous. In this paper, we investigate one potentially deleterious effect of sex‐skewed harvests. Both theory and experimental data suggest that male ungulates are limited in their absolute ability to inseminate females. Using a Leslie‐Matrix model and published data on impala, we show that the interaction between sperm limitation and harvests with highly male‐biased sex ratios can lead to greatly reduced female fecundity (defined as the number of young born) and population collapse. These results are robust and suggest that present methods of harvesting may not be optimal, or viable, in the long term.
