login

A Model for User-Oriented Data Provenance in Pipelined Scientific Workflows

Lecture notes in computer sciencePublished 1 January 2006Open access
Shawn Bowers, Timothy McPhillips, Bertram Ludäscher, Shirley Cohen, Susan B. Davidson
Citations99
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.35
SNIP0.55
View PDF

TL;DR

This work develops a simple provenance model capable of supporting a wide range of scientific use cases even for complex models of computation such as process networks, and is capable of reconstructing complete data and invocation dependency graphs for a workflow run.

Abstract

Integrated provenance support promises to be a chief advantage of scientific workflow systems over script-based alternatives. While it is often recognized that information gathered during scientific workflow execution can be used automatically to increase fault tolerance (via checkpointing) and to optimize performance (by reusing intermediate data products in future runs), it is perhaps more significant that provenance information may also be used by scientists to reproduce results from earlier runs, to explain unexpected results, and to prepare results for publication. Current workflow systems offer little or no direct support for these "scientist-oriented" queries of provenance information. Indeed the use of advanced execution models in scientific workflows (e.g. process networks, which exhibit pipeline parallelism over streaming data) and failure to record certain fundamental events such as state resets of processes, can render existing provenance schemas useless for scientific applications of provenance. We develop a simple provenance model that is capable of supporting a wide range of scientific use cases even for complex models of computation such as process networks. Our approach reduces these use cases to database queries over event logs, and is capable of reconstructing complete data and invocation dependency graphs for a workflow run.

Keywords

Computer ScienceDecision Sciences