Organizational value contention and managerial mindsets
Journal of Business EthicsPublished 1 July 1991
Jeanne Liedtka
Citations71
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score3.04
SNIP3.01
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This paper focuses on the differing ways in which organizations send conflicting signals, in the form of contending organizational values, to their managers regarding the appropriate behavior in a given situation, and the impact that this has on the manager's decision-making process. It posits the existence of three different types of organizational value contention and examines their influence on the resulting patterns of sense-making and behavior evident in the manager's responses, based upon interview data from a cross-section of managers in two organizations.
Keywords
Business, Management and Accounting
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
23,416 Citations2017Barney G. Glaser, Anselm L. Strauss
Academy of Management ReviewBuilding Theories from Case Study Research
23,160 Citations1989Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
Academy of Management ReviewOrganizational Culture and Leadership
9,693 Citations1986William G. Tierney, Edgar H. Schein
American Educational Research JournalFoundations of Behavioral Research
7,414 Citations1974Rex Stockton, Fred N. Kerlinger
Academy of Management ReviewCategorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action
1,383 Citations1987Jane E. Dutton, Sue Jackson
Administrative Science QuarterlyThe Role of Value Congruity in Intraorganizational Power
337 Citations1988Cathy A. Enz
