Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus.
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPublished 1 September 1989
Jennifer D. Campbell, Patricia J. Fairey
Citations123
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score3.87
SNIP3.12
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Etude experimentale des effets de la taille des minorites sur l'influence (conformite mesuree par le changement en direction de la norme, rapidite de la decision, persistance en-dehors de la source), en fonction de l'extremisme de la norme (plausibilite) et de l'attention portee au stimulus (possibilite de verification) tenant de distinguer des mecanismes de dependance informative et normative
Keywords
Social Sciences
Journal of Abnormal & Social PsychologyA study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
4,659 Citations1955Morton Deutsch, Harold B. Gerard
Several modifications of the Asch experiment in which the S judges the length of lines in the company of a group of “stooges” who carry out the experimenter's instructions are described.
Medical Entomology and ZoologyAttitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches
3,406 Citations1981Richard E. Petty, John T. Cacioppo
Attention and Self-Regulation : A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior
2,612 Citations1981Charles S. Carver, Michael F. Scheier
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyCompliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique.
1,582 Citations1966Jonathan L. Freedman, Scott C. Fraser
Significant evidence is produced that greater external pressure generally leads to greater compliance with the wishes of the experimenter, and the one exception appears to be situations involving the arousal of cognitive dissonance.
Psychological ReviewDifferential contributions of majority and minority influence.
1,217 Citations1986Charlan Nemeth
Psychological ReviewConformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit.
910 Citations1958Edwin P. Hollander
“Beginning with the consideration that social behavior depends upon attributes of the individual, conditions of the situation, and inputs to a dynamic system arising from their interaction, a theoretical conception relating conformity and status is presented.
Psychology of Group Influence
863 Citations1981Paul B. Paulus
Advances in experimental social psychologyToward A Theory of Conversion Behavior
662 Citations1980Serge Moscovici
Four assumptions are discussed in the chapter, in order to understand Compliance and Conversion, in which a consistent minority can exert an influence to the same extent as a consistent majority and that the former will generally have a greater effect on a deeper level, while the latter often has less at that level.
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyGroup decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule.
418 Citations1987Martin F. Kaplan, Charles E. Miller
Advances in experimental social psychologySituational Factors In Conformity
392 Citations1965Vernon L. Allen
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyOperationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective
204 Citations1983Brian Mullen
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyStudies in social influence
185 Citations1980Serge Moscovici, Bernard Personnaz
Basic Group Processes
183 Citations1983Paul B. Paulus
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAn examination of self-perception mediation of the foot-in-the-door effect.
148 Citations1979William DeJong
Journal of Abnormal & Social PsychologyThree situational determinants of conformity to social norms.
133 Citations1954Solomon C. Goldberg
In general, greater distance makes for greater conformity, and conformity occurs within the first few exposures to the group norm.
Psychological BulletinToward an integration of some models and theories of social response.
108 Citations1986Paul R. Nail
Personality and Social Psychology BulletinConformity and Group Size
105 Citations1985Chester A. Insko, Richard H. Smith +3 more
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyPerception of groups, size of opposition, and social influence
102 Citations1977David A. Wilder
European Journal of Social PsychologyThe role of social pressure, attention to the stimulus, and self‐doubt in conformity
84 Citations1983Abraham Tesser, J.H. Campbell +1 more
Self-Attention Theory: The Effects of Group Composition on the Individual
66 Citations1987Brian Mullen
Group Discussion and Judgment
60 Citations1983Martin F. Kaplan, Charles E. Miller
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyThe influence of the minority on perception: A note on a possible alternative explanation
36 Citations1980Richard M. Sorrentino, Gillian King +1 more
Personality and Social Psychology BulletinConsensus Information and the Foot-in-the-Door-Effect
27 Citations1981William DeJong
Law and Human BehaviorHomogeneity of jurors: The majority's influence depends upon their perceived independence.
19 Citations1978David A. Wilder
Perceptual and Motor SkillsComparison of Social Norms across Four Judgment Situations
2 Citations1974Dorothy Pace, Morgan MacNeil