Bayley Scales of Infant Development
Elsevier eBooksPublished 15 July 2019
Elizabeth M. Lennon, Judith M. Gardner, Bernard Z. Karmel, Michael Flory
Citations1,322
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The Bayley Scales of Infant Development are widely used to measure the level of functioning of typically developing and high-risk infants. Each of the three editions of the test reflected certain underlying assumptions about the development of cognitive, language and motor skills, affecting the tests' structure and content. The Bayley Scales are used today to assess infants who have more significant risk factors than the infants assessed with the earliest editions of the Bayley Scales; nevertheless, contemporary research supports Bayley's original theoretical perspective on the nature of cognitive, language and motor development.
Keywords
PsychologyMedicineHealth Professions
Psychology Press eBooksLife-Span Development and Behavior
2,405 Citations2014Paul B. Baltes, David L. Featherman +1 more
Psychological BulletinThe mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978.
1,106 Citations1984James R. Flynn
Elsevier eBooksBayley Scales of Infant Development
1,037 Citations2008Elizabeth M. Lennon, Judith M. Gardner +2 more
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineUnderestimation of Developmental Delay by the New Bayley-III Scale
477 Citations2010Peter J. Anderson
The Bayley-III scale seriously underestimates developmental delay in 2-year-old Australian children.
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral PediatricsThe Bayley Scales of Infant Development II
309 Citations1999SUSAN M. GAUTHIER, Charles R. Bauer +2 more
This study examines whether the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (Bayley II) Mental Scale scores vary on the basis of which item set is considered the starting point of an infant's assessment, indicating an impact on referability decisions.
The Journal of PediatricsRelationship between Test Scores Using the Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Extremely Preterm Children
243 Citations2011Tamanna Moore, Samantha Johnson +3 more
Caution is recommended in the interpretation of Bayley-III scores in population studies as the correlation with the previous edition appears worse at lower test score values and the predictive value for IQ is as yet unclear.
The Journal of PediatricsAre Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants Improving? Impact of Bayley Assessment on Outcomes
243 Citations2012Betty R. Vohr, Bonnie E. Stephens +23 more
Because the Bayley III identifies significantly fewer children with disability, it is recommended that all extremely low birth weight infants be offered early intervention services at the time of discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit, and Bayley scores be interpreted with caution.
The Clinical NeuropsychologistAssessing developmental delay in early childhood — concerns with the Bayley-III scales
186 Citations2016Peter J. Anderson, Alice Burnett
The Bayley-III needs new norms, or alternatively, it may be time for a new edition of the Bayley Scales, which is a poor predictor of later cognitive and motor impairments.
Acta PaediatricaComparison of the Bayley II Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley III cognitive scale: are we measuring the same thing?
173 Citations2011Jean Lowe, Sarah J. Erickson +2 more
Aim: to better understand differences between Bayley Scales 3rd edition (Bayley III) Cognitive Scale and Bayley II Mental Developmental Index (MDI) in 18–22‐month‐old children born term and preterm and to create a conversion algorithm usingBayley II MDI to calculate Bayley III Cognitive score.
PEDIATRICSBayley-III Cognitive and Language Scales in Preterm Children
173 Citations2015Megan Spencer‐Smith, Alicia J. Spittle +3 more
In this cohort of very preterm children, delay on the Bayley-III Cognitive and Language scales was not strongly predictive of future impairments.
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral PediatricsPredictive Validity of the Bayley, Third Edition at 2 Years for Intelligence Quotient at 4 Years in Preterm Infants
130 Citations2014Michelle M. Bode, Diane B. D'Eugenio +2 more
The Bayley-III has strong predictive validity for WPPSI-III IQ at age 4 years in preterm children in contrast with previous editions of the BSID, which has important implications for more timely evaluation of perinatal interventions, establishment of guidelines for neonatal care, and counseling parents.
American Journal of PerinatologyMaternal Education Level Predicts Cognitive, Language, and Motor Outcome in Preterm Infants in the Second Year of Life
127 Citations2016Michelle Greene, Aloka L. Patel +2 more
PEDIATRICSOverestimating Neurodevelopment Using the Bayley-III After Early Complex Cardiac Surgery
119 Citations2011Bryan V. Acton, Wayne S. G. Biggs +6 more
Researchers should be careful attributing higher Bayley-III scores to changes in acute care, as at-risk children who previously qualified for early developmental intervention may no longer do so.
Developmental Medicine & Child NeurologyDoes the <scp>B</scp>ayley‐<scp>III M</scp>otor <scp>S</scp>cale at 2 years predict motor outcome at 4 years in very preterm children?
118 Citations2012Alicia J. Spittle, Megan Spencer‐Smith +5 more
To assess the predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – Third Edition (Bayley‐III) for later motor outcome, a large number of cases were affirmative in both the infant and toddler phases.
Developmental PsychologyPatterns of low-birth-weight children's cognitive development.
80 Citations1993Fong-ruey Liaw, Jeanne Brooks‐Gunn
Early Human DevelopmentThe effect of socioeconomic status on the language outcome of preterm infants at toddler age
70 Citations2013K. Taylor Wild, Laura M. Betancourt +2 more
The findings, showing such an early influence of SES on language outcome in a cohort matched for biomedical risk, suggest that very early language interventions may be especially important for low SES preterm toddlers.
Research in Developmental DisabilitiesInstability of delay classification and determination of early intervention eligibility in the first two years of life
52 Citations2013Michele A. Lobo, David A. Paul +3 more
The results highlight that early intervention professionals, researchers, and policy makers should emphasize clinical opinion and prevalence of risk factors rather than standardized assessment findings when classifying delays and determining eligibility for services, and develop more effective developmental assessments for infants and young children.
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral PediatricsContinuing Issues With the Bayley-III
47 Citations2013Glen P. Aylward
The main purpose of developmental evaluation in infancy and early childhood is to establish current levels of neurodevelopmental function for individuals or groups of children.
Research in Developmental DisabilitiesRe-evaluating preterm infants with the Bayley-III: Patterns and predictors of change
47 Citations2013Michelle M. Greene, Kousiki Patra +2 more
Journal of PerinatologyNeurodevelopmental outcomes after hypothermia therapy in the era of Bayley-III
43 Citations2014Lina F. Chalak, Tara L. DuPont +5 more
A Bayley-III 85 cutoff identifies a disability rate of 50%, and MRI was predictive of abnormal outcomes in infants who received systemic hypothermia, which can be useful for counseling of families and planning of future studies using Bayley III.
Child DevelopmentUse of the Bayley Scales to Characterize Abilities of Premature Infants
40 Citations1985Gail Ross
Premature infants showed greater intra-individual variability in performance of motor ability and were less likely to succeed on items testing eye-hand coordination, imitation, and vocalization.
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral PediatricsThe Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II and Children with Developmental Delays
36 Citations1998Kathleen Washington, David T. Scott +3 more
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentInfant and Preschool Mental and Verbal Abilities: How Are Infant Scores Related to Preschool Scores?
29 Citations1997Victoria J. Molfese, Shawn K. Acheson
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral PediatricsUsing the Bayley-ll: Unresolved Issues in Assessing the Development of Prematurely Born Children
28 Citations1997Gail Ross, Katherine Lawson
Early Human DevelopmentUsing cluster analysis to provide new insights into development of very low birthweight (VLBW) premature infants
23 Citations2015Gail Ross, Lauren Foran +3 more
Cluster analysis defined distinct outcome groups in VLBW premature children and provides an informative means of identifying factors related to developmental outcome and may be useful in predicting later outcome and determining which groups of children will require early intervention.
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentEarly Cognitive and Environmental Correlates of Language Development at 4 Years
20 Citations1982Linda S. Siegel
Follow-Up for NICU Graduates
10 Citations2018Howard Needelman, Barbara Jackson
PEDIATRICSOverestimating Neuroprotection in Congenital Heart Disease: Problems With Bayley III Outcomes
8 Citations2011Michael E. Msall
The developmental outcomes of surviving children from a large prospective Canadian cohort after early congenital surgical heart repair at a regional center of excellence are described.