Direct visual access in reading for meaning

It is argued that reading for meaning generally uses a direct route from visual form to semantic representation, and reaction time varied with the semantic difficulty of the category decision, but generally proved invariant with respect to syllabic length.

Abstract

Two experiments examined whether phonological receding is an obligatory stage in reading for meaning or whether direct access to a word's semantic representation is the general rule. The first study demonstrated that the time to make a semantic decision about a pair of words was much more delayed by misspelling than was the time to make a phonological one. The second study investigated the effect of varying the syllabic length of a word on reaction time in a category decision task. While reaction time varied with the semantic difficulty of the category decision, it generally proved invariant with respect to syllabic length. It is argued that reading for meaning generally uses a direct route from visual form to semantic representation.