login

Social Class, Development, and Differences in Reinforcer Effectiveness

Review of Educational ResearchPublished 1 March 1976
C. Bertrand Schultz, Roger H. Sherman
Citations18
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score4.70
SNIP7.38

Abstract

The variety of stimuli that serve as reinforcers in our day-today lives is virtually endless. Yet, when it comes to instructing or experimenting with lower-class children, reinforcement frequently narrows to a class of material objects that are presumed to be most effective with this group. Candies, cookies, toys, tokens, trinkets, and money have been used in programs to improve the academic and social behavior of lower-class children (Chan, Chin, & Mueller, 1970; Hechinger, 1973; Risley, 1968; Risley & Hart, 1968; and Staats & Butterfield, 1965). Interest in tangible reinforcers for lower-class children may be due in part to the mounting evidence that, when used as directed, these incentives and reinforcers can result in significant

Keywords

PsychologySocial Sciences