login

Strategic vision or strategic con?: Rhetoric or reality?

Long Range PlanningPublished 1 February 1992
Colin Coulson‐Thomas
Citations70
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.91
SNIP2.47

TL;DR

The article examines how best to share a compelling vision, and identifies a requirement for new attitudes and approaches to communication, and suggests key roles for the chairman and the chief executive.

Abstract

Major companies devote considerable effort to communicating corporate visions and missions. Yet three recent surveys suggest that much of this effort has been counter-productive. A gap has emerged between rhetoric and reality. Arenas of confrontation have arisen between directors and managers, head offices and business units, holding companies and their subsidiaries, and between specialists and generalists. A widespread desire for corporate transformation is not matched by understanding of how to bring it about. The lack of top management commitment and of communication skills are major barriers to change. More competent directors and more effective boards are needed. The article suggests key roles for the chairman and the chief executive. It examines how best to share a compelling vision, and identifies a requirement for new attitudes and approaches to communication.

Keywords

Business, Management and Accounting