Intentionality, Pluralism, and Redescription
Philosophy of the Social SciencesPublished 14 October 2004
Lee McIntyre
Citations3
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.37
SNIP0.80
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Donald Davidson, and others, have sometimes claimed that the subject matter of social science properly consists only of intentional actions. The author disputes this claim and explores an example drawn from social psychology that shows that some social scientific phenomena cannot be explained unless they are redescribed in nonintentional language.
Keywords
PsychologyArts and Humanities
Psychological ReviewTelling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
11,285 Citations1977Richard E. Nisbett, Timothy D. Wilson
Internet Archive (Internet Archive)Theories of cognitive consistency : a sourcebook
1,988 Citations1969Robert P. Abelson
