Promoting perinatal health: is it time for a change of emphasis in research?

Abstract

Detection of modest but worthwhile treatment effects in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demands trials of large sample size. Approaches to decreasing required size of RCTs while maintaining power are needed.The epidemiological concept of population attributable fraction (AFp) was applied to the population selected for an RCT to assess its role in determining the size of treatment effect and the required sample size. The additional effect of efficacy of treatment specifically among participants at risk for attributable target events (relative risk reductionat risk [RRRat risk]) was also examined.A model is described which accounts for size of treatment effect in an RCT based on AFp and RRRat risk: RRRtrial = (AFp) (RRRat risk). The increase in RRRtrial resulting from raising AFp exceeds that possible under the traditional high risk/high response approach to trial design and allows a reduction in required trial sample size. AFp can be estimated from studies of causation that determine both risk and attributable risk (AR) associated with specific risk factors.Larger treatment effects within RCTs are enabled by choosing a target outcome having a specific cause and selecting participants at specific risk for that outcome. Using information about phenotypic and genetic predictors of AR may increase our capacity to select trial populations having high AFp.