Plugging into Students' Digital DNA: Five Myths Prohibiting Proper Podcasting Pedagogy in the New Classroom Domain
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In the spring of 2006, California Polytechnic State University (San Luis Obispo) experimented in a formal pilot of limited scope to examine if podcasting technology is truly a viable asset for improving teaching and learning outcomes. The authors have found that despite the numerous journal articles deciphering podcasting technology, few discuss the impact upon university students from a pedagogical perspective. In this article, the authors will specifically analyze their preconceived notions (myths of podcasting pedagogy) and the device’s design propensity for educational impact through both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. What specific educational contributions stem from adapting, adopting, and diffusing dynamic podcasting technology as a communication device in the classroom domain? Three core concepts will be examined, which currently challenge the technological and academic implementation of podcasting pedagogy: 1) Method: Toy vs. Tool; 2) Content: Novelty vs. Knowledge; and 3) Delivery: Convenience vs. Competence.