Bias in experimental nursing research: Strategies to improve the quality and explanatory power of nursing science
International Journal of Nursing StudiesPublished 30 July 2009
Gunilla Borglin, David Richards
Citations31
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.82
SNIP3.21
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
It is proposed that randomisation alone is a necessary but insufficient strategy and that nursing researchers rise to Rahm Hallberg's challenge by adopting the extended criteria to assist in the critical appraisal, design and reporting of all experimental research in nursing.
Abstract
In a guest editorial in this journal, Rahm Hallberg [Rahm Hallberg, I., 2006. Challenges for future nursing research: providing evidence for health-care practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies 43, 923-927] called for research which has greater explanatory power to determine the effectiveness of nursing interventions. In this paper we critique the suggestion made by the evidence-based nursing movement that randomisation per se is the principal route to better quality nursing research. In contrast, we evaluate the new CONSORT criteria for pragmatic RCTs, which assess the quality of strategies to reduce selection, performance, attrition and detection biases, allowing many different types of comparative studies to be covered by application of the checklist. We propose that randomisation alone is a necessary but insufficient strategy and that nursing researchers rise to Rahm Hallberg's challenge by adopting the extended criteria to assist in the critical appraisal, design and reporting of all experimental research in nursing.
Keywords
Social SciencesDecision SciencesHealth Professions
Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference
13,404 Citations2010William R. Shadish, Thomas D. Cook +1 more
BMJDeveloping and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
11,366 Citations2008Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe +4 more
The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task and now the council has updated its guidance.
The LancetThe CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
5,372 Citations2001David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz +1 more
The revised CONSORT statement presented here incorporates new evidence and addresses some criticisms of the original statement to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
Annals of Internal MedicineThe Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
3,805 Citations2001D G Altman, Kenneth F. Schulz +7 more
The CONSORT statement (or simply CONSORT) comprises a checklist of essential items that should be included in reports of RCTs and a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through a trial, aimed at first reports of two-group parallel designs.
JAMAImproving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement
3,343 Citations1996Colin B. Begg
BMC Medical Research MethodologyThe CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
2,754 Citations2001David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz +1 more
The revised CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
BMJEmpirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
2,512 Citations2008Lesley Wood, Matthias Egger +8 more
The average bias associated with defects in the conduct of randomised trials varies with the type of outcome, andSystematic reviewers should routinely assess the risk of bias in the results of trials, and should report meta-analyses restricted to trials at low risk of biases.
Cambridge University Press eBooksHandbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology
2,128 Citations2024Harry T. Reis, Harry T. Reis +32 more
Cambridge University Press eBooksHandbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology
1,950 Citations2014Harry T. Reis, Harry T. Reis +23 more
Enlighten: Publications (The University of Glasgow)Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance
1,892 Citations2006Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe +4 more
This research highlights the need to understand more fully the rationale behind the continued use of EMMARM, as well as the barriers to doing so, in patients and clinicians.
BMJImproving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement
1,829 Citations2008Merrick Zwarenstein, Shaun Treweek +7 more
Eight CONSORT checklist items for reporting of pragmatic trials are recommended, including the background, participants, interventions, outcomes, sample size, blinding, participant flow, and generalisability of the findings.
JAMAPractical Clinical Trials
1,693 Citations2003Sean Tunis, Daniel Stryer +1 more
Increasing the supply of pragmatic or practical clinical trials will depend on the development of a mechanism to establish priorities for these studies, significant expansion of an infrastructure to conduct clinical research within the health care delivery system, more reliance on high-quality evidence by health care decision makers, and a substantial increase in public and private funding forThese studies.
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyExplanatory and Pragmatic Attitudes in Therapeutical Trials
1,260 Citations2009Daniel Schwartz, J Lellouch
Most therapeutic trials are inadequately formulated from the earliest stages of their conception, and it often occurs that one type of approach is ethically less defensible than the other, or may even be ruled out altogether on ethical grounds.
JAMAUse of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials
1,018 Citations2001David Moher, Alison Jones +2 more
Use of the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement is associated with improvements in the quality of reports of RCTs.
Controlled Clinical TrialsStatistical Considerations in the Intent-to-Treat Principle
658 Citations2000John M. Lachin
This paper describes some of the statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat design and analysis of clinical trials and describes the potential bias that can be introduced by such postrandomization exclusions and the pursuant effects on type I error probabilities.
PLoS Clinical TrialsFactors That Can Affect the External Validity of Randomised Controlled Trials
366 Citations2006Peter M. Rothwell
Some of the issues that determine external validity are relevant to the distinction between pragmatic trials and explanatory trials, but it would be wrong to assume that pragmatic trials necessarily have greater external validity than explanatory trials.
Evidence-Based NursingImplementing evidence-based nursing: some misconceptions
304 Citations1998Alba DiCenso, Nicky Cullum +1 more
This editorial addresses the following criticisms which the authors have encountered in person and in print: (1) evidence-based practice isn't new: it's what they have been doing for years, (2) evidence-based nursing leads to “cookbook” nursing and a disregard for individualised patient care and, (3) there is an over-emphasis on randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews in evidence-based health care.
Perspectives in biology and medicineThe Randomized Controlled Trial: gold standard, or merely standard?
301 Citations2005Jason Grossman, F.J. MacKenzie
It is shown that some types of evidence commonly supposed to be inferior to all RCTs are actually superior to many, which has important consequences for research methodology, for quality of care in clinical medicine, and—especially—for research funding policy.
Journal of Advanced NursingThe development of evidence‐based nursing interventions: methodological considerations
166 Citations2004Berno van Meijel, Claudia Gamel +2 more
A model that has been successfully used to guide the process of developing and testing complex nursing interventions, especially those in which the experience of the client plays an important role is presented.
British Journal of Educational StudiesThe Need for Randomised Controlled Trials in Educational Research
144 Citations2001Carole Torgerson, David Torgerson
International Journal of EpidemiologyComparing like with like: some historical milestones in the evolution of methods to create unbiased comparison groups in therapeutic experiments
115 Citations2001Iain Chalmers
This complementary paper introduces and discusses some milestones between 1662 and 1948 in the development of methods to control selection biases when assembling therapeutic comparison groups, to ensure, as far as possible, that 'like is compared with like'.
Controlled Clinical TrialsChoosing covariates in the analysis of clinical trials
101 Citations1989Michael L. Beach, Paul Meier
With the aid of Canner's equation, using both formal analysis and simulation, the impact of covariate adjustment is further explored and it is shown that unless tight control over the analysis plans is established in advance, covariates can lead to seriously misleading inferences.
BMJUnbiased, relevant, and reliable assessments in health care
95 Citations1998I. Chalmers
This issue of the BMJ is about the attempt to control bias through randomisation, the aim here being to distinguish differences attributable to treatments from differences that reflect the characteristics of the people who have received treatment.
Randomised Controlled Clinical Trials
86 Citations1996Christopher J. Bulpitt
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatryHow to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials
79 Citations2004Steff Lewis
The aim in this article is to guide clinicians in what to look for in a report of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), so they can assess whether the trial was done adequately; it does not intend it to be a guide on how to do an RCT, as there are many such guides available.
International Journal of Nursing StudiesMoving nursing research forward towards a stronger impact on health care practice?
72 Citations2009Ingalill Rahm Hallberg
Nursing research has developed strongly and quickly during the last few decades, but how far this expansion in research has also produced knowledge for clinical practice which is relevant to the work of clinical nurses and has produced direct benefits for patients?
Journal of Health Services Research & PolicyRandomised trials of socially complex interventions: promise or peril?
71 Citations2001Nancy Wolff
The assumptions underpinning the randomised trial in relation to its application to evaluating socially complex interventions are examined.
Journal of Advanced NursingRandomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: creating bias and unreliability?
65 Citations2003Bruce Lindsay
This study evaluates four characteristics of the included reports: intervention sample size, intervention definition, involvement of intervention nurses in other aspects of the trial, and the claimed generalizability of results to suggest intervention bias is potentially a problem in randomized controlled trials.
VaccineWhen can a clinical trial be called ‘randomized’?
65 Citations2003Vance W. Berger, Jeffrey D Bears
The issue of what constitutes a randomized study is explored, paying particular attention to the specific aspects of randomization that confer each benefit.
International Journal of Nursing StudiesChallenges for future nursing research: Providing evidence for health-care practice
62 Citations2006Ingalill Rahm Hallberg
Challenges for future caring science research: a response to providing evidence for health- care practice is presented.
International Journal of Nursing StudiesDifferences in pain assessment and decisions regarding the administration of analgesics between novices, intermediates and experts in pediatric nursing
61 Citations1997Jan P.H. Hamers, Corine de Ruiter +3 more
The results indicated that expertise did not influence assessments of pain intensity, but expertise did have a distinct impact on both the subjects' confidence in their decisions, and the decision to administer analgesics.
Worldviews on Evidence-Based NursingFortuitous Phenomena: On Complexity, Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trials, and Knowledge for Evidence‐Based Practice
20 Citations2004Carl Thompson
Randomised controlled trials, whilst undoubtedly methodologically and strategically challenging, offer the most robust basis for developing primary research knowledge on the effects of complex interventions in nursing and their active components.
Evidence-Based NursingEvaluation of studies of treatment or prevention interventions
20 Citations2000Nicky Cullum
In the first article in this series, the authors discussed how critical appraisal is an important step in evidence-based health care because some published healthcare research is too poor in quality to be safely applied to clinical practice.