Interactive open access publishing and collaborative peer review for improved scientific communication and quality assurance
Information Services & UsePublished 2 October 2008
Ulrich Pöschl, Thomas Koop
Citations29
SJR quartileQ4
SJR score0.14
SNIP0.19
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The effects and advantages of open access can be efficiently and flexibly combined with the strengths of traditional scientific publishing and peer review.
Abstract
The traditional ways of scientific publishing and peer review do not live up to the needs of efficient communication and quality assurance in today's highly diverse and rapidly developing world of science. Therefore, new opportunities for enhanced sc
Keywords
Decision Sciences
Learned PublishingInteractive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance
89 Citations2004Ulrich Pöschl
A concept for such interactive scientific journals with interactive peer review and public discussion in new and traditional scientific journals is outlined, and its applicability is demonstrated by the open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.